USPTO serial 78040083
INTERNATIONAL INTERNET & TELECOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTERNATIONAL INTERNET & TELECOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stevan Lieberman
STEVAN LIEBERMAN GREENBERG & LIEBERMAN314 PHILADELPHIA AVETAKOMA PARK, MD 20912-4210UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Telecommunications switching devices, namely switches, networking and control thereof, computer programs for programmable call processing, namely the digital movement and management of information carrying signals between system processes, system gateways and multi level systems in near and far linked forms; computer programs for account management, namely, the identification, storing, and book keeping, including mathematical manipulation of signal pass through time and data amounts in conjunction with data pricing, form setup, determination and placing; computer programs for monitoring telecommunications gateway systems; computer programs for generating spread sheet and tables allowing said information to be viewed and manipulated; and computer programs for database management allowing said information to be viewed and manipulated | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Licensing of computer software and hardware; and distributorships in the field of computer software and hardware | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications gateway services | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 042 | Leasing of computers and computer software | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Savory Telecom, Inc
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named INTERNATIONAL INTERNET & TELECOM
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 18, 2003 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 28, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 21, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 14, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |