USPTO serial 78040440
FLEX-SITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FLEX-SITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Deerfield Beach, FL
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR TESTING PURPOSES, NAMELY, FOR PREPARING, TAKING AND SCORING ACADEMIC PROFESSIONAL LICENSING, CORPORATE TRAINING, CONTINUING EDUCATION DISTANCE-LEARNING AND ONLINE EXAMINATIONS | ACTIVE | Dec 6, 2000 |
| 042 | PROVIDING TEMPORARY USE OF ON-LINE DOWNLOADABLE AND NON-DOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE FOR TESTING PURPOSES, NAMELY, FOR PREPARING, TAKING AND SCORING ACADEMIC, PROFESSIONAL LICENSING, CORPORATE TRAINING, CONTINUING EDUCATION DISTANCE-LEARNING AND ONLINE EXAMINATIONS; PREPARING, ADMINISTERING, AND SCORING OF STANDARDIZED TEST IN A SECURE ENVIRONMENT FOR ACADEMIC SUBJECTS, PROFESSIONAL LICENSING AND CORPORATE TRAINING TO DETERMINE EMPLOYMENT SKILLS | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |