USPTO serial 78041013
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew S. Pollock
ANDREW S POLLOCK ANDY POLLOCK LAW, PC L.L.O.P O BOX 94812LINCOLN, NE 68509-4812UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business management services, namely, managing and organizing databases containing information on employees, customers, vendors, time card systems, scheduling and planning, company news and information; managing and organizing records and documentation for others, including ISO documentation; business management, namely, managing and organizing administrative systems for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer software design, installation and maintenance, namely, design, installation and maintenance of software applications used for database management and software applications used to manage database information online utilizing the internet, intranets, extranets and other related modes of electronic communication, for others; Computer services, namely, designing, maintaining and hosting web sites for others | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 3, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 20, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 16, 2003 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |