Drawing for DIGITAL IMS

USPTO serial 78041013

DIGITAL IMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIGITAL IMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew S. Pollock

ANDREW S POLLOCK ANDY POLLOCK LAW, PC L.L.O.P O BOX 94812LINCOLN, NE 68509-4812UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business management services, namely, managing and organizing databases containing information on employees, customers, vendors, time card systems, scheduling and planning, company news and information; managing and organizing records and documentation for others, including ISO documentation; business management, namely, managing and organizing administrative systems for othersACTIVE—
042Computer software design, installation and maintenance, namely, design, installation and maintenance of software applications used for database management and software applications used to manage database information online utilizing the internet, intranets, extranets and other related modes of electronic communication, for others; Computer services, namely, designing, maintaining and hosting web sites for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 20, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 20, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 3, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 20, 2004EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jun 24, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Apr 26, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 3, 2003IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Jan 30, 2003AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 16, 2003RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Nov 18, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 29, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 25, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 9, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 8, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 7, 2002IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Apr 15, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 10, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 3, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 3, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 21, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance