USPTO serial 78041251
UTE BED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2801613Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 30, 2003
- Examiner
- SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with UTE BED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard R. Alaniz
Richard R. Alaniz Lowe Graham Jones701 Fifth AvenueSuite 4800Seattle, WA 98104Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | PICKUP TRUCK CARGO BED MAINLY MADE OF ALUMINUM | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 10, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 15, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 15, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Dec 22, 2009 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 21, 2009 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 31, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 31, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 1, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 13, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |