Drawing for ITALIANSENSATIONS.COM

USPTO serial 78041388

ITALIANSENSATIONS.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HICKEY, SUSAN E
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ITALIANSENSATIONS.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kathryn Bennett Perkins

KATHRYN BENNETT PERKINS ROSE LAW FIRMP.O. Box 4800Fayetteville, AR 72702UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035ON-LINE RETAIL STORE SERVICES FEATURING WINE, WINE-RELATED PRODUCTS, BOOKS, MUSIC, VIDEOS AND CLOTHING; AND PROVIDING ON-LINE COMMERCIAL DIRECTORY INFORMATION CONCERNING WINE REGIONS, WINE PRODUCERS, RESTAURANTS, MUSEUMS, HOTELS AND OTHERS TOURIST ATTRACTIONS IN ITALYACTIVE—
039PROVIDING ONLINE TRAVEL AND TOURIST INFORMATION SERVICES CONCERNING ITALY; ONLINE TRANSPORTATION RESERVATION SERVICES; ARRANGING TRAVEL TOURS; AND TRAVEL GUIDE SERVICESACTIVE—
042PROVIDING AN ONLINE MAGAZINE FOCUSING PRIMARILY ON ITALY; PROVIDING ONLINE INFORMATION CONCERNING ITALY, NAMELY, THE WINES, WINE REGIONS, WINE PRODUCERS, HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS; PROVIDING ONLINE ASSISTANCE AND ADVICE RELATED TO ITALY, NAMELY, THE WINES, WINE REGIONS, WINE PRODUCERS, HOTELS AND RESTAURANTS; AND MAKING HOTEL RESERVATIONS FOR OTHERSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 15, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 30, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 24, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 24, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 14, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 8, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 8, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 30, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 5, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 16, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 1, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 24, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 26, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance