USPTO serial 78041848
WDO PROTECTION POLICY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOSID, ROBIN S
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WDO PROTECTION POLICY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | SERVICE-PROVIDING A COMPREHENSIVE PROTECTION POLICY TO INDIVIDUAL HOMEOWNERS TO PROTECT THE CONSTRUCTION (SPECIFICALLY ALL WOOD MEMEBERS) AGAINST DAMAGE FROM "SUBTERRANEAN TERMITES, DRYWOOD TERMITES, FORMOSAN TERMITES, POWDER POST BEETLES, CARPENTER ANTS AND CARPENTER BEES". THIS POLICY CARRIES A DAMAGE REPAIR AND RESTORATION WARRANTY AS WELL AS A "PRESERVING ACTION". UNDER INTERNATIONAL CLASS #37 "BUILDING CONSTRUCTION, REPAIR; INSTALLATION SERVICES: THE FOLLOWING APPLY; PARAGRAPH 1 - "PERSONS OR ORGANIZATIONS ENGAGED IN THE RESTORATION OF OBJECTS TO THEIR ORIGINAL CONDITION OR IN THEIR PRESERVATION WITHOUT ALTERING THEIR PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROPERTIES". PARAGRAPH 6 - "SERVICES WHICH UNDERTAKE TO PUT ANY OBJECT INTO GOOD CONDITION AFTER WEAR, DAMAGE, DETERIORATION OR PARTIAL DESTRUCTION". PARAGRAPH 8 - "SERVICES AND MAINTENANCE FOR PRESERVING AN OBJECT IN IT'S ORIGINAL CONDITION". IN LIGHT OF CLASS 37 WE SUBMIT THIS APPLICATION AND DO CLAIM THAT THE MARK APPLIED FOR IS NOT "MERELY DESCRIPTIVE" (SECTION 2, ITEM 6 OF THE TRADEMARK ACT)BUT IS AN ACTUAL NAME- ASSOCIATED WITH A VALID RESTORATION AND PRESERVATION SERVICE. WE FURTHER STATE THAT IT IS NOT "DECEPTIVELY MISDESCRIPTIVE" (SECTION 2, ITEM 6,) IN THAT THE MARK IS CONSISTANT WITH WHAT THE ACTUAL SERVICE OFFERS. THIS IS A UNIQUE SERVICE THAT HAS NOT BEEN OFFERED IN THE EXACT FRAMEWORK THAT OUR ORGANIZATION HAS DEVELOPED. WE FIND NO OTHER CAUSE IN SECTION 2 OF THE TRADEMARK ACT THAT WOULD DISALLOW THIS APPLICATION TO GO FORWARD. SINCE SECTION 2 DOES NOT COVER EVERY CAUSE, WE WOULD REQUEST THE COMMISSIONERS OFFICE TO ALERT US TO ANY CAUSE THAT MAY HINDER THIS REQUEST. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |