USPTO serial 78041958
ARIFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2963043Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 21, 2005
- Examiner
- KELLY, JOHN M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ARIFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Iztapalapa, MX
Iztapalapa, D.F., MX
Iztapalapa, D.F., MX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Otto Lee
OTTO O LEE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW GROUP LLP12 S FIRST ST 12TH FLSAN JOSE, CA 95113UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Product merchandising in the field of food, namely, meat, fish, meat extracts, edible oils, and fats | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 29, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 9, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 7, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 15, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 15, 2003 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 30, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 7, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 17, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 13, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |