USPTO serial 78042245
DIGITOLL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAPPENFIELD, ANN
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DIGITOLL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Eveleigh, Sydney
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software, and hardware designed for the control, collecting, reporting, measuring, billing, auditing, network management, load balancing of network usage data, transactions, log data, providing real-time statistics on traffic usage and patterns and other digital information and content and includes but is not limited to the monitoring of telecommunication systems, network gateways, switches, email gateways, web servers, proxy gateways, load-balancers, routers, packet-shapers and other devices in local and global wired or wireless data networks; the sending, retrieval and distribution of data across both wireless and wired networks, monitoring and response of-- remote networks, filtering of email, security alarms, remote devices, security devices; message delivery and processing, protocol-based message processing; paging services, the sending and receiving of facsimile services, unified messaging and other computer gateway services; wireless mobile technology, specifically, software used to control communications of mobile devices, provide user access to remote databases.; Computer software, and hardware designed for the control, collecting, reporting, measuring, billing, auditing, network management, load balancing of network usage data, transactions, log data, providing real-time statistics on traffic usage and patterns and other digital information and content and includes but is not limited to the monitoring of telecommunication systems, network gateways, switches, email gateways, web servers, proxy gateways, load-balancers, routers, packet-shapers and other devices in local and global wired or wireless data networks; the sending, retrieval and distribution of data across both wireless and wired networks, monitoring and response of-- remote networks, filtering of email, security alarms, remote devices, security devices; message delivery and processing, protocol-based message processing; paging services, the sending and receiving of facsimile services, unified messaging and other computer gateway services; wireless mobile technology, specifically, software used to control communications of mobile devices, provide user access to remote databases | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2005 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |