USPTO serial 78042529
Serial No. 78042529
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLDEN, JAMES B
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 78042529?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
COLLEN IP
COLLEN IP INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW PCTHE HOLYOKE-MANHATTAN BLDG80 S HIGHLAND AVE TOWN OF OSSINGWESTCHESTER, NY 10562Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Perfumery, toilet water, perfume waters, eau de cologne, perfume extracts, cosmetic products for the face and the body, cosmetic preparations for the bath, namely, bath salts, bath oils, bathe oils, bath foams and bath soaps, soaps deodorants for personal use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 25, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 24, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 9, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 21, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 27, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 7, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 17, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |