USPTO serial 78042669
BROOKSGIRLS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOLTZ, ALLISON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BROOKSGIRLS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen L. Baker
Stephen L Baker Baker and Rannells PA575 Route 28Suite 102Raritan, NJ 08869Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, SHIRTS, TOPS, SWEATERS, JACKETS, PANTS, SUITS, BOTTOMS, SOCKS, HATS AND CAPS; SHOES; SHORTS, COATS, NECKTIES, UNDERWEAR, VESTS, ROBES, HOSIERY, SKIRTS, DRESSES, LOUNGEWEAR, SCARVES, RAINWEAR, TROUSERS, ASCOTS, TIES, OUTER SHIRTS INCLUDING EVENING, DRESS, POLO, AND SPORTS SHIRTS, COLLARS, PAJAMAS, ROBES, SMOKING JACKETS, DRESSING GOWNS, MUFFLERS, GLOVES, HOSE, BELTS, SUSPENDERS, GARTERS, BOOTS, SLIPPERS, SHOES, OVERSHOES, BEACH WEAR, SWIMWEAR, FORMAL WEAR, NAMELY JACKETS, PANTS, SUITS, SHIRTS, SHOES, CUMMERBUNDS, TIES, SUSPENDERS AND GOWNS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 17, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 11, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 1, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 11, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 21, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 6, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 8, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 10, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 12, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 12, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 20, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 31, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |