USPTO serial 78042886
LOADES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BECK, LORETTA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LOADES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Exhall Coventry, GB
Exhall Coventry, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven M. Weinberg
STEVEN M WEINBERG GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLPSTE 7002375 E CAMELBACK RDPHOENIX, AZ 85016Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | engineering services; structural engineering services; engineering consultancy; research and development of new products for others; product safety testing and inspection of products for others; technical inspection of new product design in the field of transportation; design for others in the field of transportation; industrial design for others in the field of transportation; graphic art design for others in the field of transportation; computer aided engineering and computer aided design for others in the field of transportation; marine, air and land vehicle design services; technical and scientific consultation services in the field of transportation; chemical laboratory services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 26, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 3, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 23, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 25, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 4, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 15, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 13, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |