USPTO serial 78043275
DE BEERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COLLIER, DAVID E
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DE BEERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marie Driscoll
MARIE DRISCOLL FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017-1822UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | HATS, NECKTIES, SCARVES, BELTS AND SHOES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by De Beers LV Trade Mark Limited
- Other trademarks owned by De Beers LV Trade Mark Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Rapids Trade Mark Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named DE BEERS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 7, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 31, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 30, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 23, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 1, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 24, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 7, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 30, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 8, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 17, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 1, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2001 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |