USPTO serial 78043290
DE BEERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DE BEERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marie Driscoll
MARIE DRISCOLL FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017-1822UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | FLATWARE, NAMELY KNIVES, FORKS AND SPOONS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DE BEERS LV TRADE MARK LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by DE BEERS LV TRADE MARK LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by Rapids Trade Mark
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Similar marks named DE BEERS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 25, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 9, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 15, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 2, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 27, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 7, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |