USPTO serial 78043354
EXTREME RELEVANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERKINS, ELLEN J
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EXTREME RELEVANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan M. Mulholland
SUSAN M MULHOLLAND LUCASH GESMER & UPDEGROVE40 BROAD ST STE 325BOSTON, MA 02109-4310UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and computer software | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | PROVIDING ASP SERVICES FOR OTHERS, NAMELY, CREATING AND MAINTAINING SPECIALIZED WEB SITES FOR OTHERS FOR THE CREATION OF INTEGRATED WEB COMMUNITIES FEATURING WEBSITE LINKS TO MULTIPLE BUSINESS ENTITIES WITH E-COMMERCE FUNCTIONALITY; COMPUTER SERVICES PROVIDING CUSTOMIZED ONLINE WEB PAGES, SEARCH ENGINES, USER-DEFINED INFORMATION, AND ONLINE WEB LINKS TO NEWS, WEATHER, SPORT, SHOPPING, CURRENT EVENTS, REFERENCE MATERIALS, AND CUSTOMIZED EMAIL MESSAGES, ALL IN A WIDE RANGE OF USER-DEFINED FIELDS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |