Drawing for OWENS CORNING

USPTO serial 78043376

OWENS CORNING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KON, ELISSA GARBER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OWENS CORNING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rodney A. Nowland

RODNEY A NOWLAND OWENS CORNING1 OWENS CORNING PKWYTOLEDO, OH 43659-1000UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Home theater systems comprising the following items sold together as a unit - projectors and projector cases therefore, and - video processors; DVD players; video cassette recorders; high definition television (HDTV) component, namely, HDTV encoders and decoders; projection screens; coaxial cables and connectors therefore; audio and video cables and connectors therefore; amplifiers; receivers; speakers; speaker wire and connectors therefore; home theater control systems, namely, remote control devices for use with home theater components and controls for lights and lighting systems; surge protectors; wiring harnesses; electrical lighting systems comprising lights, light mounts, light controls and light wiring; computer hardware; computer software that allows individual to personalized their choice of television programs that can be viewed at certain times, and that allows individuals to view such programs in interactive formatsACTIVE—
020Home theater furniture and decor packages comprising the following items sold together as a unit - home theater seats and components thereof, and - proscenium stage structure and components thereof, cabinets for audio and video equipment, non-metal decorative columns and decorative rail molding, acoustical wall and ceiling panels and components thereof, carpeting, and laminate flooringACTIVE—
037installation of custom-designed home theater systemsACTIVE—
042custom design of home theater systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 19, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 16, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 23, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 3, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 3, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 26, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 23, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 14, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 30, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance