Drawing for INNOVATING WITH E - SOLUTIONS.

USPTO serial 78043861

INNOVATING WITH E - SOLUTIONS.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SAPPENFIELD, ANN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INNOVATING WITH E - SOLUTIONS.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James Michael Faier

GEORGE A PELLETIER JR CANTOR COLBURN LLP55 GRIFFIN RD SBLOOMFIELD, CT 06002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for interfacing and communicating with other sets of computer programs for use in the field of enterprise resource planning, encompassing finance, sales, ordering, procurement, production, inventory control, distribution and logistics, and human resourcesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 22, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 28, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Sep 9, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 17, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 28, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 25, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 10, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 10, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 29, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 9, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 20, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
May 16, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
May 16, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Mar 24, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 19, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance