Drawing for OFFICE XP

USPTO serial 78043997

OFFICE XP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RADEMACHER, APRIL LUEDERS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OFFICE XP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William O. Ferron, Jr.

WILLIAM O FERRON JR SEED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW GROUP PLL701 FIFTH AVE STE 6300SEATTLE, WA 98104-7092UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042computer services, namely, creating and distributing text, sound, graphics and video for use on computer networks, wireless networks and the Internet; hosting the web sites of others on a computer server for the Internet; software leasing services; consulting services in the fields of computers, software, electronics, telecommunications, security and authentication; providing personal and business information specified by users over computer networks, wireless networks and the Internet; temporary use of non-downloadable workgroup and document management software; consulting services and technical support services in the fields of computers, computer networks, software, document management and workgroup systems; web site and internal network site design and management services; providing information in the fields of computers, computer networks, software and computerized document management and workgroup systems via computer networks and the Internet; computer services, namely, providing software updates via computer networks and the Internet; licensing of intellectual property, namely, trademarksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 23, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 6, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 6, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 6, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 6, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 11, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 22, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 13, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 16, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 11, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 17, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 15, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance