USPTO serial 78044034
COOKING AT HOME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAYASH, SUSAN C
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COOKING AT HOME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert D. McDonald
ROBERT D MCDONALD MILLER THOMSON LLPBARRISTERS & SOLICITORS2700, 10155-102 STEDMONTON, AB T5J 4G8Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed publications, namely cookbooks, periodicals and magazines featuring recipes, columns and articles in the fields of cooking, food, nutrition, lifestyle and entertainment ideas and related subjects | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Publishing services, namely publishing an on-line magazine containing columns and articles in the fields of cooking, food, nutrition, lifestyle and entertainment ideas and related subjects; providing on-tine information and data bases in the field of cooking and lifestyle | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 17, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |