USPTO serial 78044176
SANICIDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RADEMACHER, APRIL LUEDERS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SANICIDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | STABILIZED AQUEOUS CHLORINE DIOXIDE FOR USE IN PAPER PULP PROCESSING; AS A REPLACEMENT FOR CHLORINE IN CHEMICAL FORMULATIONS USED AS DISINFECTANTS, ODOR ELIMINATORS, BACTERICIDES, ANTICORROSIVES, SLIMICIDES, AND WATER PURIFICATION FOR USE BY SUCH INDUSTRIES/FACILITIES AS FOOD PROCESSING PLANTS, DAIRIES, ICE PLANTS, OIL WELL DRILLING OPERATIONS AND PAPER MILLS | ACTIVE | May 1, 1997 |
| 003 | BLEACH AND BLEACHING AGENTS FOR USE IN PAPER PULP AND TEXTILE PROCESSING PLANTS, DAIRIES, ICE PLANTS, OIL WELL DRILLING OPERATIONS, PAPER PULP PROCESSING PLANTS, RESTAURANTS AND HEALTH CARE FACILITIES; ALL PURPOSE CLEANERS FOR USE ON HARD SURFACES IN SUCH INDUSTRIES AS FOOD PROCESSING PLANTS, DAIRIES, ICE PLANTS, RESTAURANTS AND HEALTH CARE FACILITIES | ACTIVE | May 1, 1997 |
| 005 | ALL PURPOSE DISINFECTANT | ACTIVE | May 1, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |