USPTO serial 78044191
VIVID.TV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAPPENFIELD, ANN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIVID.TV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Theodore Oshman
THEODORE OSHMAN OSHMAN HELFENSTEIN MIRISOLA & SCHWARTZ116 JOHN STNEW YORK, NY 10038-3300UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Electronic mail service, including print, facsimile, telephony and voice messaging; electronic mail service providing access by multiple users to electronic billboards, instant messaging and chat rooms for the retrieval of messages and information; audio and video messaging and teleconferencing; messaging and exchange of audio and video recordings; providing an interactive electronic program guide for information concerning viewing and/or hearing internet based broadcasts, radio broadcasts, cable broadcasts, television broadcasts and satellite broadcasts; providing for the rating by viewers and listeners of broadcasted programs through the use of an interactive electronic program guide, electronic mail service, electronic billboard, instant messaging and chat room; all provided via a global computer network on the top level domain assigned to the country of Tuvalu, as well as on local area networks, and further accessible via the use of wireless and hand-held devices incorporating wireless application protocol, interactive communication and two-way voice recognition. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |