USPTO serial 78044317
HALL FINANCIAL GROUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HALL FINANCIAL GROUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alex Patel
JOHN ALUMIT PATEL & ALUMIT PC16830 VENTURA BLVD STE 360ENCINO, CA 91436UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | (Based on Use in Commerce) ADVERTISING AND BUSINESS SERVICES, NAMELY PROMOTING THE SERVICES OF OFFICE BUILDINGS, APARTMENTS AND MULTI-FAMILY PROPERTIES THROUGH THE DISTRIBUTION OF PRINTED MATERIALS AND VIA THE INTERNET; BUSINESS MANAGEMENT SERVICES | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 1991 |
| 036 | (Based on Use in Commerce) FINANCIAL SERVICES, NAMELY REAL ESTATE BROKERAGES, REAL ESTATE LEASING OF OFFICE BUILDINGS, APARTMENTS, AND MULTI-FAMILY PROPERTIES, PROVIDING LOAN FINANCING, DIRECT EQUITY INVESTMENTS; MANAGEMENT OF OFFICE BUILDINGS, APARTMENTS, AND MULTI-FAMILY PROPERTIES | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 1991 |
| 037 | (Based on Use in Commerce) BUILDING CONSTRUCTION AND REPAIR OF OFFICE BUILDINGS, APARTMENTS, AND MULTI-FAMILY PROPERTIES | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 1991 |
| 042 | (Based on Intent to Use) ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN SERVICES, NAMELY DESIGN OF OFFICE BUILDINGS, APARTMENTS, AND MULTI-FAMILY PROPERTIES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hall Financial Group
- Other trademarks owned by Hall Financial Group
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named HALL FINANCIAL GROUP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 9, 2004 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 29, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 25, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 5, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 18, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |