Drawing for WINDCHILL PROJECTLINK

USPTO serial 78044413

WINDCHILL PROJECTLINK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WINDCHILL PROJECTLINK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas V. Smurzynski

THOMAS V SMURZYNSKI LAHIVE & COCKFIELD LLP28 STATE STBOSOTN, MA 02109UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for computer aided design, CAD, for general use, computer-aided manufacturing, CAM, for general use, and computer aided engineering, CAE, for general use; computer software for workflow, process and production automation; computer software for visualization and digital mockup; computer software for information management of business, organizational, supplier, engineering, component, product, production and maintenance information; computer software for use in software development, and accompanying user guides sold with such software as a unitACTIVE—
041Computer education training services, namely, training and education services in the field of computer software.ACTIVE—
042Technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems via telephone; updating of computer software; maintenance of computer software, namely, maintenance and error correction services for computer software; computer consultation; product development for others; repair of computer softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 13, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 16, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 16, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 16, 2004EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jun 3, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 29, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
May 29, 2003RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Sep 11, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 6, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 3, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 5, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 5, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 5, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 20, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance