USPTO serial 78044683
DATABITCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DATABITCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PRERECORDED AUDIO TAPES, PHONOGRAPH RECORDS, COMPACT DISCS, DVD'S, COMPUTER ROM DISCS, AND MICROCHIPS FEATURING MUSIC, SPOKEN WORD, AND SOUND EFFECTS; PRERECORDED VIDEO TAPES, VIDEO COMPACT DISCS, DVD'S, DIGITAL MEMORY CARTRIDGES, COMPUTER ROM DISCS AND MICROCHIPS FEATURING MUSIC VIDEOS, ANIMATION, MOVIES, SPOKEN WORD PERFORMANCES AND MUSICAL PERFORMANCES; DVD'S, DIGITAL MEMORY CARTRIDGES AND VIDEO COMPACT DISCS FEATURING INTERACTIVE GAMES; COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR CREATING MUSIC AND SOUND EFFECTS; COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR COMBINING WORDS, MUSIC, AND SOUND EFFECTS; COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR INTERACTIVE GAMES; ELECTRONIC HARDWARE INTERFACES TO COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND MUSIC EQUIPMENT | ACTIVE | Jan 21, 2001 |
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY LIVE PERFORMANCES BY A MUSICAL GROUP; LIVE PERFORMANCE OF SPOKEN WORD; LIVE PRESENTATION OF SOUND EFFECTS; PRODUCTION OF ARTISTIC AUDIO INSTALLATIONS; PRODUCTION OF LIVE MUSICAL AND SPOKEN WORD PERFORMANCES; AUDIO RECORDING AND PRODUCTION OF MUSIC; MUSIC COMPOSITION AND ARRANGING; AUDIO RECORDING AND PRODUCTION OF SOUND EFFECTS; SOUND RECORDING STUDIO SERVICES; INSTRUCTION SERVICES, NAMELY INSTRUCTION IN MUSIC COMPOSITION, AUDIO PRODUCTION, AND THE USE OF MUSIC SOFTWARE AND ELECTRONIC MUSIC EQUIPMENT | ACTIVE | Jul 20, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 7, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2003 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 25, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 5, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 5, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 7, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |