Drawing for FLYOVER

USPTO serial 78044791

FLYOVER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with FLYOVER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gerald B. Rosenberg

TAL BAHAR FLYOVER TECHNOLOGIES INC1456 FOWLER LNLOS ALTOS, CA 49024UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND COMPUTERS PROVIDING FOR THE CREATION, MODIFICATION, SELECTION, NAVIGATION, AND DISPLAY OF TWO DIMENSIONAL AND THREE DIMENSIONAL TOPOGRAPHICAL MAPS AND TOPOLOGICALLY PRESENTED INFORMATION AND INSTRUCTIONAL MANUALS SOLD AS A UNITACTIVEMar 22, 2000
042COMPUTER CONSULTING SERVICES, NAMELY COMPUTER SYSTEM DESIGN, INTEGRATION AND DEPLOYMENT, IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER BASED CREATION, MODIFICATION, SELECTION, NAVIGATION, AND DISPLAY OF TWO DIMENSIONAL AND THREE DIMENSIONAL TOPOGRAPHICAL MAPS AND TOPOLOGICALLY PRESENTED INFORMATIONACTIVEMar 22, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 16, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 30, 2003GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 24, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 21, 2003EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Jul 20, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 27, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 25, 2003SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 14, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2003IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jan 13, 2003EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jan 12, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 9, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 19, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 4, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 28, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 26, 20011.ADSEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED—
Dec 26, 20011.BASec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED—
Dec 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 21, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance