USPTO serial 78044793
FLYOVER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FLYOVER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gerald B. Rosenberg
TAL BAHAR FLYOVERTECHNOLOGIES INC1456 FOWLER LNLOS ALTOS, CA 49024UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND COMPUTERS PROVIDING FOR THE CREATION, MODIFICATION, SELECTION, NAVIGATION, AND DISPLAY OF TWO DIMENSIONAL AND THREE DIMENSIONAL TOPOGRAPHICAL MAPS AND TOPOLOGICALLY PRESENTED INFORMATION AND INSTRUCTIONAL MANUALS SOLD AS A UNIT | ACTIVE | Mar 22, 2000 |
| 042 | COMPUTER CONSULTING SERVICES, NAMELY COMPUTER SYSTEM DESIGN, INTEGRATION AND DEPLOYMENT, IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER BASED CREATION, MODIFICATION, SELECTION, NAVIGATION, AND DISPLAY OF TWO DIMENSIONAL AND THREE DIMENSIONAL TOPOGRAPHICAL MAPS AND TOPOLOGICALLY PRESENTED INFORMATION | ACTIVE | Mar 22, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FlyOver Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by FlyOver Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named FLYOVER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 27, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 10, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 18, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 29, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 27, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Dec 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |