Drawing for BIDEX

USPTO serial 78044944

BIDEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VASQUEZ, EDD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIDEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GEORGE H KOBAYASHI

GEORGE H KOBAYASHI MASUDA, FUNAI, EIFERT & MITCHELL LTD203 N LASALLE ST STE 2500CHICAGO, IL 60601-1262UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008PRECISION CUTTING TOOLS FOR USE IN THE HOME, OFFICE, ART STUDIO, FRAMING SHOPS, PHOTO PROCESSING SHOPS AND ARTS and CRAFTS SHOPS, NAMELY, STRAIGHT CUTTING BLADES OF VARIOUS SHAPES WITH HANDLES; SCISSORS FOR CUTTING PAPER, CLOTH AND OTHER MATERIALS; FOAM-AND-MAT BOARD KNIVES; UTILITY KNIVESACTIVE—
016PRECISION CUTTING TOOLS FOR USE IN THE HOME, OFFICE, ART STUDIO, FRAMING SHOPS, PHOTO PROCESSING SHOPS AND ARTS AND CRAFTS SHOPS, NAMELY, PAPER EMBOSSERS; CUTTING ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, CUTTING MATS OF VARIOUS SIZES; SPECIALTY CUTTING TOOLS FOR CUTTING CIRCLES, OVALS, AND ANGLES IN PAPER, FABRIC AND OTHER MATERIALS, NAMELY, CIRCLE AND OVAL SHAPE PAPER CUTTERS; LETTER OPENERS; PAPER HOLE PUNCHES FOR PUNCHING STANDARD-SHAPED HOLES IN PAPER AS WELL AS FOR PUNCHING VARIOUS SHAPES FROM PAPER AND OTHER MATERIALS; PAPER CUTTERS UTILIZING GUILLOTINE LEVEL BLADES, PAPER CUTTERS UTILIZING ROTARY DISK BLADES RUNNING ALONG A RAIL, AND PAPER CUTTERS UTILIZING STRAIGHT RAZOR BLADES RUNNING ALONG A RAILACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 24, 2004PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Apr 30, 2004PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Feb 12, 2004EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Nov 28, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 4, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 12, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 23, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 5, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 5, 2002GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 26, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 23, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 19, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 20, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance