USPTO serial 78045464
PANACEA ENGINEERING CO. WE BRING GOOD THINGS TO YOU FROM FLIGHT TO LIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PANACEA ENGINEERING CO. WE BRING GOOD THINGS TO YOU FROM FLIGHT TO LIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Consulting in the fields of Electrical/Mechanical Engineering | ACTIVE | May 28, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Fischer, William C.
- Other trademarks owned by Fischer, William C.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PANACEA ENGINEERING CO. WE BRING GOOD THINGS TO YOU FROM FLIGHT TO LIGHT
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 31, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 25, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 3, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 24, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 28, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 25, 2003 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Nov 28, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 5, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 13, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 5, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 1, 2001 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |