USPTO serial 78045660
PRETTY WOMAN SYNDROME PROJECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, REBECCA A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PRETTY WOMAN SYNDROME PROJECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Mental health services | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Institute for Strategic Change
- Other trademarks owned by Institute for Strategic Change
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PRETTY WOMAN SYNDROME PROJECT
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 3, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 18, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 17, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 16, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 24, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 21, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 23, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 1, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2003 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jun 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 9, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 29, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 9, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 25, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |