USPTO serial 78046023
GLASSGUARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COWARD, KATHRYN E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GLASSGUARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
2132 NZ Hoofddorp, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Linda Heilman
LINDA HEILMAN RECKITT BENCKISER INC1655 VALLEY RDWAYNE, NJ 07470-2044UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Product to protect glassware, porcelain and earthenware in dishwashing machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 003 | bleaching preparations and other substances for laundry and dishwashing, whether or not in solid, fluid or gel form; laundry preparations for dry cleaner's; polishing preparations for kitchen and glassware; cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive preparations; carpet cleaning preparations; detergents, soaps; decalcifying and descaling preparations and means for household purposes; fabric softeners, laundry additives; stain removing preparations; all aforementioned goods with or without a disinfectant component | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2002 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jun 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |