USPTO serial 78046036
ADMITONE.ORG FILM SCHOOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ADMITONE.ORG FILM SCHOOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carl H. Settlemyer
CARL H SETTLEMYER LUTZKER & LUTZKER LLP1000 VERMONT AVE NW STE 450WASHINGTON, DC 20005-4929UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Online educational services, namely, providing workshops, seminars and lectures in the field of screenwriting, cinematography, directing, acting and other aspects of film production; entertainment services, namely a website featuring motion pictures created by student filmmakers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 31, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 10, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2002 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |