Drawing for Serial No. 78046145

USPTO serial 78046145

Serial No. 78046145

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BERK, STEVEN R
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 78046145?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Melanie J. Cicchese

FREDRIKSON & BYRON PA DAVID C W4000 PILLSBURY CTR200 S SIXTH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1425

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical preparation used to treat general pain; vitamins; contact media for use with ultrasound and electromedical contact media, namely gels and lotionsACTIVE—
008Hair scissorsACTIVE—
010Accessories for medical apparatus, namely contact media for use with ultrasound and electromedical contact media, namely padsACTIVE—
021hair combs and brushesACTIVE—
026Hair ornamentsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 31, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 11, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 18, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 17, 2004DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 16, 2003DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 1, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 12, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 4, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 21, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 3, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 14, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 12, 2002GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 19, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 27, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance