USPTO serial 78046160
SURF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SURF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRUCE W GREENHAUS
BRUCE W GREENHAUS QUALCOMM INCORPORATED5775 MOREHOUSE DRSAN DIEGO, CA 92121-1714UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software development tools for use in the testing and development of cellular telephone equipment-including cellular telephones, wireless modems, wireless terminals, and other such wireless remote units, namely, a development tool consisting of a modular circuit board and associated software, and user's manual sold as a unit therewith, and comprising a mobile station modem mother board; a memory subsystem; emulation field programmable gate array (FPGA); a multi-mode programmable logic device (PLD); RF interface; user interface; clock generator; serial bus interface; power management component; and test status display blocks for use in emulating a code division multiple access (CDMA) subscriber unit, and intended for laboratory use by developers of CDMA subscriber units to speed their hardware and software development times | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2003 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Mar 19, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 7, 2002 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |