USPTO serial 78046317
CHEROKEE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3261721Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 10, 2007
- Examiner
- SONNEBORN, TRICIA L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CHEROKEE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
HOLLISTER, CA
HOLLISTER, CA
HOLLISTER, CA
HOLLISTER, CA
Sacramento, CA
Sacramento, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Glen L. Gross
Glen L. Gross SHLESINGER, ARKWRIGHT & GARVEY LLP770 L Street, Suite 950SACRAMENTO, CA 95814UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Land vehicles, namely motorcycles | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 8, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HB CUSTOM COMPONENTS, INC
- Other trademarks owned by HB CUSTOM COMPONENTS, INC
- Other trademarks owned by DAVID LEE AND RAY SHOTT
- Other trademarks owned by FAST TRAC MANUFACTURING, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Fien, Robert B.
- Other trademarks owned by Fien, Robert B.
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named CHEROKEE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 18, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 5, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 11, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 12, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 9, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 20, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 12, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 19, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 25, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 12, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 22, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 13, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 29, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 16, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 15, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |