Drawing for FLEXIS, INC.

USPTO serial 78046822

FLEXIS, INC.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLEXIS, INC.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RICK IFLAND

ANDREAS KOGELNIK FLEXIS INC1335 ALMA STPALO ALTO, CA 94301UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software, namely, database management systems and applications, information management systems and applications, knowledge management systems and applications, document and data management applications, document and data exchange applications, document imaging and archiving, distributed networking software, information exchange software, search engine software, dynamic browser and portal software, all for the medical records fieldACTIVE—
042Computer software consulting, namely, database, information and knowledge management consulting for the medical records field; hosting the web sites of others for the medical records field; designing and implementing web sites, web pages and web portals for others for the medical records field; medical information portals for the medical records fieldACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 31, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 31, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 1, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 27, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2005TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jun 27, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 27, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2005COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 4, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 4, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 28, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 15, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 31, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 10, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 21, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 1, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 15, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 21, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 21, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance