Drawing for FASTTRACK WIRELESS SOLUTIONS

USPTO serial 78046831

FASTTRACK WIRELESS SOLUTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CHOSID, ROBIN S
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FASTTRACK WIRELESS SOLUTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James Walsh

PAMELA S LESTER ESQ NUMEREX CORPSTE 2001600 PARKWOOD CIR SEATLANTA, GA 30339-2119

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Web telemetry devices which monitor and control geographically remote applications, namely, computer software and hardware which enables access to a computer network platform for transmission of wireless data telemetry signals; modems; radio transmitters; computers for receiving wireless data telemetry signalsACTIVEJan 1, 2004
038Telecommunications services, namely, a service that enables data to be transmitted electronically over a wireless interfaceACTIVEJan 1, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (TROA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 13, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 13, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 7, 2004LSOULATE FILED STATEMENT OF USE
Mar 23, 2004EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jan 15, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Oct 16, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 9, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Sep 3, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Sep 3, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 4, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 23, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Jul 23, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 3, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 4, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 23, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 10, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 6, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance