USPTO serial 78046931
E7
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINNEGAN, TIMOTHY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with E7?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew B. Mayfield
ANDREW B MAYFIELD ARMSTRONG TEASDALE1 METROPOLITAN SQ STE 2600ST LOUIS, MO 63102-2793UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | ADVERTISING SERVICES, NAMELY, CREATING CORPORATE LOGOS FOR OTHERS, CREATING CORPORATE AND BRAND IDENTITY FOR OTHERS; COMMERCIAL BUSINESS MANAGEMENT SERVICES; BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, NAMELY, BUSINESS MANAGEMENT SUPERVISION; OFFICE WORK, NAMELY, PROCUREMENT, NAMELY PURCHASING COMPUTERS AND SOFTWARE FOR OTHERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS; HOSTING THE WEB SITES FOR OTHERS ON A COMPUTER SERVER FOR A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; NEWS AGENCIES, NAMELY, GATHERING AND DISSEMINATION OF NEWS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 13, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 24, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 24, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 7, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 16, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 7, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 15, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 25, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |