USPTO serial 78046963
S&F
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PRICE, WANDA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with S&F?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David A. Plumley
DAVID A PLUMLEY COLORADOCHRISTIE, PARKER & HALE, LLP350 W COLORADO BLVD STE 500PASADENA, CA 91105-1821Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat; fish for food purposes; poultry, namely, chicken and turkey; game; preserved, canned, frozen, processed, dried, and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies; jams; eggs; milk and other dairy products, namely, sour cream, dairy-based dips and spreads, whipped topping and whipped topping mix, cheese foods, evaporated milk, instant non-fat dry milk; edible oils and fats; fruit preserves; pickles; applesauce; non-dairy creamer; fruit based fillings for pies; fruit and vegetable salads; processed beans; soups and soup bases used for making soups and sauces; chili with or without beans; peanut butter; flaked coconut; vegetable protein bits having a bacon flavor; processed edible seeds; potato chips; margarine; soft spreads, namely, margarine substitutes; luncheon meats; cheese substitutes; potato salad; processed nuts; snack mix consisting primarily of processed fruits, processed nuts, and raisins; nut and fruit toppings; bouillon; canned pork and beans; giardiniera used for salad garnish and appetizer; processed stuffed olives; frozen, uncooked hamburger patties; non-dairy dips and spreads | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 10, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 24, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 2, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 12, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 1, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2002 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Jul 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |