USPTO serial 78047387
LAS VEGAS CHINESE YELLOW PAGES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 16, 2002
- Examiner
- HAYES, GINA CLARK
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LAS VEGAS CHINESE YELLOW PAGES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Rowland Heights, CA
Rowland Heights, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Albert J.C. Chang
ALBERT J C CHANG LAW OFFICE OF ALBERT J C CHANG19138 WALNUT DR STE 100ROWLAND HEIGHTS, CA 91748UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Business directory and phone listing | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 13, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 27, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 29, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |