USPTO serial 78047492
Serial No. 78047492
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, REBECCA A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 78047492?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | telecommunications; multimedia telecommunications; telecommunications by computer networks, electronic means, data transmission, radio and by telephone; electronic mail; computer-aided transmission of signals, sound, images, messages and data by Hertzian wave, electronic and digital means, cable or by satellite; transmission of data contained in databases; network mail services; electronic data exchange services; on-line information services; sending of messages and data between networked computer systems; access to databases and computer database servers; electronic mail; dissemination of information by Hertzian wave and digital means, cable, satellite, or by electronic means, notably for worldwide communications networks or private or restricted access networks; secure transmission of data, sound or images. | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design of telecommunications systems; creation of virtual and/or interactive images; design of graphics and visuals in the field of multimedia; technical consultancy, expertise and information in the field of telecommunications; leasing of access time to a computer data base server centre; accommodation of sites for world wide communications networks or private or restricted access networks; design of sites for world-wide communications networks or private or restricted access networks; world-wide computerized telecommunications networks. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 23, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 23, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 23, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 4, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 24, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |