USPTO serial 78047568
PERFORMANCE LEARNING MODULES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PERFORMANCE LEARNING MODULES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Rockville Centre, NY
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | INSTRUCTIONAL, EDUCATIONAL AND TEACHING MATERIALS FEATURING CONTENT THAT IS ORGANIZED BY THE JOB FUNCTIONS A STUDENT WILL NEED TO SUCCESSFULLY ACCOMPLISH IN THEIR WORK SETTING TO IMPROVE THE INTERPERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS IN THEIR WORK SETTING, AND FEATURING CONTENT THAT DIRECTS A STUDENT TO PERFORM SPECIFIC PHYSICAL ACTIONS IN THEIR WORK SETTING ENABLING THEM TO EMULATE THE BEHAVIORS THAT WILL SUCCESSFULLY ACCOMPLISH SAID JOB FUNCTIONS, WITH SAID MATERIALS PRESENTED TO STUDENTS USING AN ELECTRONIC MEDIUM SUCH AS THE INTERNET, ITS ASSOCIATED PROTOCOLS SUCH AS HTML, AND SOFTWARE TO DECODE SAID PROTOCOLS SUCH AS A MODERN HTML DECODER GENERALLY KNOWN AS A "WEB BROWSER" | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |