USPTO serial 78047620
VISUAL PYTHON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2918251Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 11, 2005
- Examiner
- SMIGA, HOWARD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with VISUAL PYTHON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
VANCOUVER, BC, CA
VANCOUVER, BC, CA
St. Michael, BB
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software, namely, graphical interface for developing and deploying software scripts, components and applications | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 13, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ACTIVESTATE SOFTWARE INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ACTIVESTATE CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by ACTIVESTATE CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Activestate SRL
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named VISUAL PYTHON
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 24, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jun 4, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 27, 2010 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 6, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 25, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 6, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2003 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |