USPTO serial 78047812
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cynthia R. Martin
MELANIE FIX ASSISTANT COUNSEL NAVY EXCHANGE SERVICE COMMAND3280 VIRGINIA BCH BLVDVIRGINIA BEACH, VA 23452UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Goods made of leather and goods made of imitation leather, namely, purses, clutches, travel bags, all purpose athletic bags, shopping bags, tote bags, wallets, key cases, and key fobs | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 1995 |
| 025 | Women's, men's, and children's clothing, namely, sports wear in the nature of sweaters, sweat suits, shirts, jeans, pants, dresses; outer wear in the nature of jackets, overcoats, hats, scarves, and gloves; active wear in the nature of sweat shirts, t-shirts, and sneakers; intimate apparel in the nature of sleepers, bras, panties, lounge wear, and hosiery; accessories in the nature of scarves and belts; shoes; men's sportswear in the nature of sweaters, sweat suits, shirts, jeans, and pants; outer wear in the nature of rain coats; intimate apparel in the nature of pajamas, underwear, and hosiery; children's clothing in the nature of sleepers, underwear, and outer wear, namely, snow suits, jackets, and shoes | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 1995 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 25, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |