USPTO serial 78048045
KING PREMIUM LAGER BEER BIER CERVEZA NATURALLY BREWED PRODUCT OF AUSTRALIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRZYZ, KAREN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KING PREMIUM LAGER BEER BIER CERVEZA NATURALLY BREWED PRODUCT OF AUSTRALIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Australian Brewing Corporation Pty Ltd
Little River, Victoria 3211, AU
Other trademarks owned by Australian Brewing Corporation Pty Ltd
Australian Brewing Corporation Pty Ltd
Little River, Victoria 3211, AU
Other trademarks owned by Australian Brewing Corporation Pty Ltd
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Melea East
Cynthia L. Stewart FROST BROWN TODD LLC400 West Market Street32nd FloorLOUISVILLE, KY 40202-3346Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Alcoholic beer | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Australian Brewing Corporation Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Australian Brewing Corporation Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named KING PREMIUM LAGER BEER BIER CERVEZA NATURALLY BREWED PRODUCT OF AUSTRALIA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 6, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 6, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 20, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 30, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 16, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |