USPTO serial 78048210
STRAP IN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRYAN JOHNSON, HELLEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STRAP IN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Doreen Miller
ST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE CO11 EXECUTIVE WOODS CT STE 1SWANSEA, IL 62226-2016Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | SHIRTS, PANTS, SWEATPANTS, SHORTS, BOXER SHORTS, BRAS, SPORT TOPS, JACKETS, COATS, SWIM SUITS, PAJAMAS, HATS, AND SOCKS ALL RELATED TO AUTO RACING | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Miller, Scott V.
- Other trademarks owned by Miller, Scott V.
- Other trademarks owned by Schaller, Steve
- Other trademarks owned by Schaller, Steve
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named STRAP IN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 31, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 31, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 31, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 28, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 11, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 1, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |