USPTO serial 78048238
PILATES STUDIO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NEVILLE, BRIAN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PILATES STUDIO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Larry B. Miller
ANDREW L SPENCE PILATES INC75 LAFAYETTE AVESUFFERN, NY 10901UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | PROVIDING LESSONS, TRAINING, WORKSHOPS, AND SEMINARS FOR EXERCISE AND PHYSICAL CONDITIONING; PHYSICAL EDUCATION SERVICES; PHYSICAL FITNESS INSTRUCTION; TRAINING IN THE USE AND OPERATION OF EXERCISE EQUIPMENT; AND TEACHING IN THE FIELD OF PHYSICAL FITNESS | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | PROVIDING FACILITIES FOR EXERCISE AND PHYSICAL CONDITIONING; PHYSICAL FITNESS CONSULTATION; PROVIDING PHYSICAL REHABILITATION AND PHYSICAL THERAPY | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 21, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 19, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |