USPTO serial 78048292
THE SOPHISTICATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2917883Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 11, 2005
- Examiner
- GOLDEN, JAMES B
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE SOPHISTICATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT J. ROCHE
ROBERT J ROCHE NEWELL, CAMPBELL & ROCHE520 S GRAND AVE STE 390LOS ANGELES, CA 90071-2600UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | HOME THEATER FURNITURE AND DECOR PACKAGES, FEATURING SOME OR ALL OF THE FOLLOWING ITEMS, SOLD AS A UNIT - HOME THEATER SEATS AND STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS THEREOF, PROSCENIUM STAGE STRUCTURE, NON-METAL DECORATIVE COLUMNS, NON-METAL DECORATIVE RAIL MOLDING, NON-METAL ACOUSTICAL WALL AND CEILING PANELS AND COMPONENTS THEREOF, LAMINATE FLOORING, AND CARPETING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 15, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by L.A. AUDIO VIDEO, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by L.A. AUDIO VIDEO, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Owens-Corning Fiberglas Technology Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Owens-Corning Fiberglas Technology Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named THE SOPHISTICATE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 6, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 11, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 30, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 9, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 3, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 20, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 1, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 9, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 19, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 1, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |