Drawing for MERIT

USPTO serial 78048323

MERIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MERIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen Chesnoff

STEPHEN CHESNOFF SHACK SIEGEL KATZ FLAHERTY & GOODMAN530 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016paper towels, toilet tissue, paper napkins, facial tissueACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 12, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 14, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 14, 2004REINREINSTATED—
Mar 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 1, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 10, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 5, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 11, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 11, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 11, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 3, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 20, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 20, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 25, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 2, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 12, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 9, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 30, 2001CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 18, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 7, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 7, 2001AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance