USPTO serial 78048377
CLARION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CLARION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Princeton Junction, NJ
Princeton Junction, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert D. Frawley
SUSAN R SCHICK COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN PC1133 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | facial make-up, foundation make-up, facial powder, concealer, blush, eye shadow, mascara, eye lining pencil, liquid eye liner, eye make-up remover, lipstick, nail color, nail care preparations, moisturizer, facial soap, skin creams, eye cream, skin cleanser, skin toner, facial mask, bath soap, liquid soap, skin conditioner, hair shampoo, hair conditioner | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 25, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 19, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 27, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |