Drawing for SAFE

USPTO serial 78048498

SAFE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLANDU, FLORENTINA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAFE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jess M. Collen

JESS M COLLEN COLLEN LAW ASSOCIATESTHE HOLYOKE MANHATTAN BLDG80 S HIGHLAND AVEOSSINING, NY 10562-5615

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer hardware, computer software for calculating, printing, determining, transmitting and generating postage, sorting and shipping packages and letters, database management of mailing, shipping, and postage, tracking shipping and tracking postage use, and software for use in coding, decoding and authenticating confidential and financial informationACTIVE—
042providing hardware and software computer solutions that facilitate postage and shipping, namely, consultation services in the field of postage and shipping, integrating, facilitating, and analyzing hardware and computer software to facilitate postage and shipping, computer software design and development services for others in the field of postage and shipping, providing encoding, decoding and verification services for use with confidential and financial information, namely, data encryption servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 18, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 18, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 19, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 18, 2004ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Dec 23, 2003ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Nov 25, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 5, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 27, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 23, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 20, 2003GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 18, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 23, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 18, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 12, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 3, 2002REINREINSTATED—
Mar 25, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 9, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 3, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 21, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance