USPTO serial 78048628
INTRICITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BERK, STEVEN R
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTRICITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Adrienne L. White, Esq.
ADRIENNE L WHITE ESQ BURNS, DOANE, SWECKER & MATHIS LLPP O BOX 1404ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-1404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware; computer network hubs, switches and routers; electric meters; computers software for use in data capture, collection, manipulation, storage, retrieval, transfer and reporting of energy consumption, generation, cost, usage and related information in the field of energy management | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Customer relationship, billing, and management services in the field of energy | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Maintenance and repair of computer networks, computer software and computer hardware | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer software design; application services provider services, namely hosting computer software applications for others; hosting of digital content on the Internet; energy data management and analysis; technical support services, namely, the monitoring and troubleshooting of computer hardware, networks and software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AES Corporation, The
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named INTRICITY
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 30, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2003 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 16, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |